Travel Photography group posting on GLOBOsapiens

Picture Rating?

Postings 1 - 10 of 37

Page: 1 2 3 4

mortimer Premium account Joined: Jun 04 Points: 14648 Posts: 525 Posted: 2004-11-01 22:20:00    Hi GLOBO's Hey folks, it's great that we got the discussion about pictures started! I'd really like, to still have more views of our members on the pictures. Every single member more who joins in the discussion is important. When we are talking about picture quality and rating we are also discussing our 5 star system.... How do you interprete the 5 stars? I rekon there are several views of the standards. Would you please post your understanding... Like that we probably will end up with a general agreement on the stars. Just to start off I copied an interpretation already given in another topic: [zero stars] - dont rate non-travel or indecent pictures at all! * relevant to travel and/or the community, nice ** the mediocre pic, good title and description or technically ok *** technically good, focused, colour, contrast, interesting **** technically brilliant, good composition, lighting, shadows, colourful ***** exellent first impression, unique situation or place, scratch and dust free, picture tells a story, something unusual about the picture... Please: what is your view? Martin --- Today is the first day of the rest of your life, enjoy it! Reply    Reply with quote    Contact mortimer   spaceout Premium account Joined: Jun 02 Points: 20395 Posts: 56 Posted: 2004-11-01 22:52:00    Bonjour, Picture rating is a sticky subject as many people don't have 1-good cameras (like me a few years ago) 2-don't really know about photography (and therefore their pics are point-and-shot) 3-people rate by what they like, not the composition, subject matter or what not. Yes, I agree that Globo should only reflect the best, but it is also a guide for traveling. In some situations, one can have a picture that is not that great, but the subject matter can be quite interesting. Therefore it should be rated high too, don't you think? VK --- Festina Lente (Hurry Slowly) Reply    Reply with quote    Contact spaceout   mortimer Premium account Joined: Jun 04 Points: 14648 Posts: 525 Posted: 2004-11-01 23:06:00    Hi spaceout "In some situations, one can have a picture that is not that great, but the subject matter can be quite interesting. Therefore it should be rated high too, don't you think? " Great point! Thats what we try to work out, get all the different views and pack them in one sort of generally agreed rating system. Why don't you try to explain how you rate? Martin --- Today is the first day of the rest of your life, enjoy it! Reply    Reply with quote    Contact mortimer   spaceout Premium account Joined: Jun 02 Points: 20395 Posts: 56 Posted: 2004-11-01 23:13:00    Hi, For exemple, I got a look at the wonderful picture from vebo23 about a lamppost in Paris. It's a great pic in all. Yet it only had a rating of 3 before my rating that is ;-). But because it was a lamppost, generally it will be rated less than a scenery, even though the subject matter is as important as per Art and history than a scenery. VK --- Festina Lente (Hurry Slowly) Reply    Reply with quote    Contact spaceout   mortimer Premium account Joined: Jun 04 Points: 14648 Posts: 525 Posted: 2004-11-02 09:19:00    Hi Vicky I did not say that this system of interpreting the stars is "the right one" it's just one that rangutan posted in reply to a topic in the intern talk forum... Another approach for the rating could be: * Bad picture please delete... ** below average *** average **** Good ***** Great/Perfect There's the problem that 5 stars are possible... if people are not sure they tend to go for the middle. But if you look at the rating system above then you could skipp * as this is really not worth uploading... and then you just got 4 stars left! And now it would be just a question what is good. Anybody got more interpretations? Martin [ This Message was edited by: mortimer on 2004-11-02 09:25 ] --- Today is the first day of the rest of your life, enjoy it! Reply    Reply with quote    Contact mortimer   mistybleu Premium account Joined: Aug 04 Points: 37583 Posts: 176 Posted: 2004-11-02 19:07:00    I'm no photography and joined Globo to discuss traveling and to share pictures of my travels, at first it didn't occur to me that 'point and click' didn't constitute a good picture. I would like to be a better photography but this only comes with practise. I tend to gives stars on whether I like the pictures or not. If I don't like the picture I don't rate it. But there has to be something which is appealing to me. I have noticed there is a bias towards scenic pictures. and I think we should be able to like other things apart from nature scenes. I'm not sure this adds to the discussion, but the centiment is there. --- "So many places, so little time" ((*_*)) Reply    Reply with quote    Contact mistybleu   mortimer Premium account Joined: Jun 04 Points: 14648 Posts: 525 Posted: 2004-11-02 20:01:00    Hey Misty Thank you for joining in, in this discussion! A simple point and click can also be a very good picture. As you say rightfully it's always in the eye of the one that looks at the image to decide whether to like or dislike the picture. But, how do you think about the stars? How do you make up your mind how many stars to give the picture? Is there a general guideline you follow, which could be of help to other members? Thank you for your contribution! Martin --- Today is the first day of the rest of your life, enjoy it! Reply    Reply with quote    Contact mortimer   bear495 Joined: May 03 Points: 8634 Posts: 177 Posted: 2004-11-02 23:41:00    I appreciate Misty's input. There are many who are not photographers by nature, however, we all tend to have our own aesthetics (from Greek aisthEtikos of sense perception, from aisthanesthai to perceive). We each have that which excites our senses and that which "turns us off." I like a combination of the star systems that you mention, Martin. However, that is also tempered by personal taste in subject matter. All of this discussion is wonderful and should give us all a greater appreciation for the efforts of others. It should also help us to improve our decisions on what we should (and should not) add to this site. Russ --- "Own only what you can carry with you; know language, know countries, know people. Let your memory be your travel bag." Alexander Solzhenitsyn Reply    Reply with quote    Contact bear495   horourke Premium account Joined: Sep 04 Points: 7579 Posts: 124 Posted: 2004-11-03 11:18:00    Thank you for very clear interpretation of star system. I believe your post requires no further adjustment. I hope tht many more members will find the information helpful. --- Hugh Reply    Reply with quote    Contact horourke   mortimer Premium account Joined: Jun 04 Points: 14648 Posts: 525 Posted: 2004-11-03 11:45:00    Hi Hugh / GLOBO's Above rating systems are just two possible interpretations. Nothing is clear and definite at the moment, I would say. There is also this possiblity: ***** Perfect shot **** Great shot *** good shot ** average shot * below average There's a big difference. What do you think? Martin --- Today is the first day of the rest of your life, enjoy it! Reply    Reply with quote    Contact mortimer   Page: 1 2 3 4