|
Travel Photography group posting on GLOBOsapiens |
|
 |
 |
Still lifes --- Whats your opinion?


mortimer


 Premium account
Joined: Jun 04 Points: 15075
Posts: 528
|
|
|
 |

bear495

Joined: May 03 Points: 8634
Posts: 177
|

Posted: 2004-10-25 16:20:00  
Martin,
When a person posts a still-life picture, I believe that the rating depends upon how a person feels about the subject, the quality of the photo, and the other nuances seen as peripherals in the photo. For example, the phot titled "Amsterdam" is basically a photo of cheeses on a storage rack. Amsterdam is noted for its cheeses. However, there is nothing else in the photo to give context or meaning. The photo titled "Come on in, the water's warm" is different. There is a nice dhow, placed in a setting with a beautiful ocean and two scenic islands. This photo makes me want to travel to the location where this was taken. Quite a contrast!
Of course, Marianne's "Mediterranean Moonlight" has been highly rated for a long period of time. The aspects of this photo are romantic and intriguing.
One of the types of still-life that really causes me discomfort, though, is seeing photographs of someone's plate of food. To me, that could be left off of this website.
Russ
--- "Own only what you can carry with you; know language, know countries, know people. Let your memory be your travel bag." Alexander Solzhenitsyn
|
Reply
Reply with quote
Contact bear495
|
|
|
 |

rangutan

 Premium account
Joined: Aug 04 Points: 34752
Posts: 1044
|
|
|
 |

mortimer


 Premium account
Joined: Jun 04 Points: 15075
Posts: 528
|

Posted: 2004-10-29 08:10:00  
Hi Rudi
I agree with you that these pictures are not really traditional still lifes. I just found that these picture's image setting and composing got the quality of still lifes. These pictures are not the obvious travel images but got this special element.
I'm sure one or the other photographer has arranged the picture. (I for instance have put the lone teak chair next to the palm tree and composed this picture.) That's really the point I mean with these pictures, they are or could be arranged. That's why I found them to be still lifes because they are arranged to.
Photography has got it's basics in painting. Still lifes always have been a great topic for painters.
A photographer is also a painter, he always constructs an image. But he is not using paint and brush but his camera to paint his image. A photographer paints his image by looking through his camera and chosing which detail and perspective he wants to show. He is also deciding what to leave out of the picture.
Like that I thought we could talk about this painter subject too....
If you want to improve your photographic skills you can begin with studying image composition. You can learn about that by looking at painted images in museums (classic painting). This can give you ideas what to look out for when taking your pictures. Perhaps at one point you will not longer be taking pictures but creating images....
Martin<p>[ This Message was edited by: mortimer on 2004-10-29 08:12 ] [ This Message was edited by: mortimer on 2004-10-29 08:13 ] --- Today is the first day of the rest of your life, enjoy it!
|
Reply
Reply with quote
Contact mortimer
|
|
|
 |

rangutan

 Premium account
Joined: Aug 04 Points: 34752
Posts: 1044
|

Posted: 2004-10-29 14:02:00  
Yes, I like that thought, like the world as stage and a vast open studio. I wish id had more patience in taking pics in the past, even got embarassed sometimes taking pictures at all. Thinking of it, the best photos are those where a bit of patience and thought about the object itself (and the purpose of the shot) was considered! --- Rudolf "Rangutan" Graspointner
|
Reply
Reply with quote
Contact rangutan
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|