Suggestions group posting on GLOBOsapiens

Again about rating incognito

Postings 11 - 14 of 14

Page: 1 2

jorgesanchez Premium account Joined: May 05 Points: 41629 Posts: 77 Posted: 2008-07-28 14:45:00    Hurrah! Finally we will be able to see who has rated a report. Perhaps the reports should also show the members who rate them, even those members who do not leave a message. Now we all understand that the recent reports having the same points appear first. But my complain is still in force, because “somebody” was busy during the last week rating recent no-polish reports with 3 points. For instance, my Amish report (among two others) was written last week (it still appears today in the first page in Globo), so it is very fresh, and according to the new criteria it should be reflected in the first page of general reports, and not in the third and fourth. It had 7 five points’ votes in a row, what means that is was not too bad, and suddenly, one night, this “somebody” rated it with 3 points (I do not complain for that 3 points rate, but I complain that this person took the effort to rate only my report and Amanda’s because they were in the first page of general reports where only 100 % polish authors reports are reflected. If instead of that person I am taking about was another Globo member without any bias, then no problem, I accept gladly those 3 points, which means good report. I am not defending my reports, but denouncing malpractices in rating reports. But now I am happy to know that this “somebody” attitude towards no-polish reports, if repeated, will be unveiled. Just my two taka (Bangladesh currency) Jorge --- Bonum est faciendum et prosequendum, et malum vitandum. Reply    Reply with quote    Contact jorgesanchez   louis Premium account Joined: Dec 05 Points: 13399 Posts: 17 Posted: 2008-08-20 15:18:00    I completely agree with Jorge (even if I am from Poland). There is one person who is underrating picture of most of the members (except two - three members). Well it is true that rating is free and everything depends on your taste, but Jorge is right that very often, very beautiful pictures received very low rating because they were higher than pictures of this member (or pictures of his/her favourites members). That is quite unfair. I really don't know did Globo staff will/can do with that , but I just wanted to share my opinion with Globies. --- Louis Reply    Reply with quote    Contact louis   horourke Premium account Joined: Sep 04 Points: 11274 Posts: 142 Posted: 2008-08-20 16:16:00    Thank you Rafal for this very open and fair contribution. I suggest a committee of three top members (say chosen from anyone above 17,000 points) be given the task of deciding if the evidence of bias is overwhelming. If it is so then all ratings from this memeber should be eliminated to restore the downgraded material to fair positions in the site ranking. I looked at only a single page taken at random from this person's activity record and the evidence is indeed overwhelming. --- Hugh Reply    Reply with quote    Contact horourke   jorgesanchez Premium account Joined: May 05 Points: 41629 Posts: 77 Posted: 2008-08-21 10:38:00    i would suggest mortimer as the best, or one of the best, specialist in photography, and rangutan as the best report specialist, to check dubious pictures or reports ratings. just my two kopecks xopxe --- Bonum est faciendum et prosequendum, et malum vitandum. Reply    Reply with quote    Contact jorgesanchez   Page: 1 2